Right to information - better implementation

as observed three categories of officers are noticed
1/Who are with malign intention not willing to disclose the info. i.e. reluctant to divulge the public record.
2/ who are having no any malign intention or ulterior motive in making the record public but either not in a position to interpret the true spirit & provision of the act or having no seriousness of the repercussions of their dereliction, or their superiors/ subordinate not supporting or assisting falling in the category of 1 or 3.
3/who are responsive to the act & ready to react but either system or record preservation is not allowing them to do so.
Sir, the provision of section 5(5) deemed PIO, 19(b) to award compensation to the applicant suffered loss under this act by the commission, & 20(1) &(2) to impose penalty & refer the case for disciplinary action by H/ commission will take care of category 1.
Section 4 proactive disclosures, & 26 proper publicity & make arrangement for proper training will take care of category no. 2
But sir if H/ commission is taking recourse to section 25(g) 25(g)direction by H/ COMMISSION TO CONCERNED PUBLIC authority for category 3 positive early results are sure.
as sir we have millions of educated unemployed youth out of 55 million population of India in the age group of 15 to 40,l under the circumstances if certain youth are directed to engage exclusive for classification of the record in specified categories of A,B,C,D,E etc under the classification of the record that will be much more easy, convenient & user friendly to provide the record under this act. Also the same will prevent public authority/ shirkers form showing frivolous excuses & suffering of citizens will be minimized along with time being employment generation to the youth. even under JN employment guarantee scheme also this can be done.
Especially when H/ Cm Gujarat has declared this year as NIRMAL Gujarat Year this will definitely serve multi purpose.