RTI PROBLEMS, ISSUES & REMEDIES FOR EFFECTIVE IMPLLEMENTATION

 info cant denied to parliament or legislature cant be refused to applicant- THUS RTI IS SILENT REVOLUTION



BENEFITS / ADVANTAGES NOT REACHES COMPLETELY & TIME BOUND TO NEEDY OR FOR WHOM PRAPOSED- reasons:-


 CORRUPTIONS, MANIPULATIONS, MALADMINISTRATION & MIS MANAGEMENT

 THUS POOR PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

 LACK OF PAD / CITIZEN CHARTER

 RECORD CLASSIFICATION & MAINTENANCE POOR

 EQUITY BEFORE LAW ARTICLE 14 OF CONSTITUION NOT MAINTAINED

 FIFO PROCEDURE NOT FOLLOWED

 GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL NOT QUICK

 PUBLIC DUTY NOT PERFORMED SCRUPULOUSLY

INJUSTICE ANY WHERE IS DANGEROUS TO JUSTICE EVERYWHERE

 ACTIONS SPEAKS LOUDER THAN WORDS

 TWO WEAKNESS OF HUMAN BEING-

 TO BE SILENT WHEN IT IS PROPER TIME TO SPEAK & TO SPEAK WHEN IT IS PROPER TIME TO BE SILENT



Remedies for effective implementation of RTI



 INFORMED CITIZENRY

 TRANSPARENCY , ACCOUNTABILITY & CONTAIN CORRUPTION

GOVERNMENT & IT’S INSRUMENTALITIES HOLD ACCOUNATBLE TO GOVERNED

 PRACTICAL REGIME FOR RTI

 REVEALATION OF INFO MAY COFLICT WITH -

 public interests ,efficient operations of the Governments, optimum use of limited fiscal resources and the preservation of confidentiality of sensitive information

 TO HARMONISE THESE CONFLICTING INTEREST TO PROVIDE CERTAIN INFO PRESERVING PARAMOUNATANCY OF DEMOCRATIC IDEAL.

 SOUL SEARCHING, ACT AS PER CONSCIOUS.

 TO GO WITH THE CONTENT OF THE ACT NOT INTENT.

 HAVE POSITIVE ATTITUDE & TREAT APPLICATIONS UNDER RTI TO EVALUATE/ INTROSPECT TO IMPROVE .

RTI success story- My experience in Surat municipal corporation

 YEAR RECEIVED DISPOSAL AVERAGE

05-07 974 775

07-08 1595 1283 132 P.M.

08-09 2934 2288 244 P.M.

09-10 6366 4903 530

10-11 6798 6190 566

11-12 8321 5938 693



TOTAL 26988 21377 408

YEAR RECEIVED DISPOSAL AVERAGE



05-07 103 103

07-08 209 209 17 P.M.

08-09 427 427 35 P.M.

09-10 463 463 38

10-11 429 429 36

11-12 715 572 60

TOTAL 2346 2203 36

IN 09-10 FIRST APPEAL 8% TOTAL REQUEST

IN 10-11 6.3% in 11-12 8.60

OVERALL LESS THAN 8.7%

UP TO march 2012 -334 CASES REPORTED FOR SECOND APPEALS AS PER REFERENCE OF STATE COMMISSION

THUS LESS THAN 15% OF 2346 FIRST APPEAL & LESS THAN 1.15% OF TOTAL APPLICATIONS 15205

193 SO FAR OUT OF TOTAL 26988 during 6.5 years THUS LESS THAN 1 %





This shows excellent performance on part of SMC even compared with global datas. where in t delay or rejection is to the tune of almos 50% or more